PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXE vs. FCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXE vs. FCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than FCG's 26.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PXE has outperformed FCG with an annualized return of 8.47%, while FCG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.54% annualized return.


PXE

1D
0.49%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
31.85%
6M
23.37%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
18.34%
10Y*
8.47%

FCG

1D
0.48%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
26.42%
6M
22.68%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. FCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
31.85%-2.82%-1.86%7.69%58.32%94.04%-36.76%-1.69%-23.35%1.02%
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
26.42%-2.28%4.16%2.55%47.24%98.49%-23.20%-15.76%-34.81%-11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and FCG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007

0.93

The correlation between PXE and FCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXE vs. FCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXE
FCG

Energy

97.4%
99.2%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

PXE
97.4%
FCG
99.2%

Basic Materials

PXE
2.6%
FCG

-

Financial Services

PXE
0.3%
FCG

-

Communication Services

PXE

-

FCG

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXE

-

FCG

-

Consumer Defensive

PXE

-

FCG

-

Healthcare

PXE

-

FCG

-

Industrials

PXE

-

FCG

-

Real Estate

PXE

-

FCG

-

Technology

PXE

-

FCG
0.8%

Utilities

PXE

-

FCG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXE vs. FCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE
PXE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. FCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXEFCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.75

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.85

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.00

6.28

+0.72

PXE vs. FCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the FCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and FCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXEFCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.49

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.12

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.11

+0.29

Drawdowns

PXE vs. FCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, smaller than the maximum FCG drawdown of -97.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and FCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXEFCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.99%

-97.20%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-13.07%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-29.44%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-33.33%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

-85.04%

+4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.80%

-74.51%

+65.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.00%

-65.37%

+37.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

5.93%

-0.22%

Volatility

PXE vs. FCG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) have volatilities of 9.75% and 9.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXEFCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

9.81%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.74%

20.13%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.49%

26.81%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

33.46%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.99%

38.31%

-1.32%

PXE vs. FCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FCG's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXE vs. FCG - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FCG's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.17%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
2.02%2.98%2.54%2.78%3.03%1.86%4.10%1.70%1.29%1.54%6.62%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PXE and FCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCG has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to PXE (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs FCG's -97.20%.

On 10-year performance, PXE leads with 8.47% vs 4.54% for FCG. On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXE has performed better with a 8.47% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 2.02% for PXE.

PXE tracks Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while FCG tracks ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.60% for FCG.

PXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXE and FCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer