PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXE vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXE vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 33.42% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 26.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PXE has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 8.45%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


PXE

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
33.42%
6M
22.41%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
18.51%
10Y*
8.45%

ENFR

1D
1.15%
1M
0.77%
YTD
26.03%
6M
24.35%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
33.42%-2.82%-1.86%7.69%58.32%94.04%-36.76%-1.69%-23.35%1.02%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
26.03%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and ENFR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2013

0.73

The correlation between PXE and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXE vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXE
ENFR

Energy

97.4%
98.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Energy

PXE
97.4%
ENFR
98.8%

Basic Materials

PXE
2.6%
ENFR

-

Financial Services

PXE
0.3%
ENFR
0.2%

Communication Services

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Healthcare

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Industrials

PXE

-

ENFR
3.4%

Real Estate

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Technology

PXE

-

ENFR

-

Utilities

PXE

-

ENFR
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXE vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE
PXE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXEENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.32

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

9.04

-1.96

PXE vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXEENFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.97

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.05

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.48

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.35

-0.17

Drawdowns

PXE vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXEENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.99%

-68.28%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-8.64%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.65%

-15.58%

-22.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-20.29%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.17%

-62.64%

-17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

-3.86%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.99%

-15.98%

-12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

3.17%

+2.57%

Volatility

PXE vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 9.57% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 6.25%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXEENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

6.25%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

11.42%

+9.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.44%

14.65%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

19.30%

+14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.98%

24.68%

+12.30%

PXE vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXE vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than ENFR's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.98%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
PXE
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF
2.00%2.98%2.54%2.78%3.03%1.86%4.10%1.70%1.29%1.54%6.62%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXE and ENFR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXE has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to ENFR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.90% vs 8.45% for PXE. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.00% for PXE.

PXE tracks Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXE and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer