PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWZ vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.59% return.


PWZ

1D
0.25%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.73%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
1.91%

ZMUN

1D
0.07%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PWZ and ZMUN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWZ vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWZ
PWZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ZMUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWZZMUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.55

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWZZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

6.55

-6.09

Drawdowns

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWZZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-0.09%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-0.01%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

Volatility

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWZZMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

0.54%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

0.54%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

0.54%

+5.35%

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWZ vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.57%3.41%3.28%2.84%2.49%2.28%2.34%2.51%2.53%2.48%2.86%3.16%
ZMUN
F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF
2.28%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWZ and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PWZ is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PWZ is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

PWZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

PWZ tracks ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PWZ and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWZ and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer