PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWZ vs. VWLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than VWLTX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PWZ has underperformed VWLTX with an annualized return of 1.66%, while VWLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.32% annualized return.


PWZ

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.41%
6M
0.80%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
1.66%
ALL TIME*
3.16%

VWLTX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.20%
6M
-0.20%
YTD
0.47%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.32%
ALL TIME*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.43M$5.37M$5.33M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
1.12%1.26%2.16%6.55%-11.35%1.94%4.90%8.72%0.32%6.82%
VWLTX
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
0.47%4.80%2.44%7.56%-10.43%1.83%6.21%8.77%0.89%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PWZ and VWLTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2007

0.53

The correlation between PWZ and VWLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWZ vs. VWLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PWZ
PWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VWLTX
VWLTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VWLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VWLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWZVWLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.21

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

7.57

+1.29

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VWLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWZ and VWLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, smaller than the maximum VWLTX drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and VWLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWZVWLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-49.97%

+28.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.47%

-3.09%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.09%

-5.77%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

-16.01%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.56%

-16.01%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-2.20%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-10.14%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.90%

+0.04%

Volatility

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWLTX) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWZVWLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.01%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

2.54%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

3.15%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

4.62%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

4.51%

+1.37%

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VWLTX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWZ vs. VWLTX - Dividend Comparison

PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than VWLTX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWZ
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.73%3.41%3.28%2.84%2.49%2.28%2.34%2.51%2.53%2.48%2.86%3.16%
VWLTX
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
3.46%4.51%3.98%3.09%2.91%2.65%3.24%3.82%3.49%3.70%3.98%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWZ and VWLTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWZ has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to VWLTX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWZ dropped -21.49% vs VWLTX's -49.97%.

VWLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWZ and VWLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer