Correlation
The correlation between PWZ and FCAL is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
PWZ vs. FCAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL).
PWZ and FCAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. FCAL is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWZ or FCAL.
Performance
PWZ vs. FCAL - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PWZ:
-0.21
FCAL:
0.08
PWZ:
-0.32
FCAL:
0.06
PWZ:
0.96
FCAL:
1.01
PWZ:
-0.22
FCAL:
0.02
PWZ:
-0.82
FCAL:
0.06
PWZ:
2.92%
FCAL:
1.74%
PWZ:
8.52%
FCAL:
5.46%
PWZ:
-21.48%
FCAL:
-14.81%
PWZ:
-8.64%
FCAL:
-4.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than FCAL's -1.85% return.
PWZ
-4.69%
-0.47%
-5.55%
-1.72%
1.38%
-0.46%
1.89%
FCAL
-1.85%
-0.56%
-2.72%
0.82%
2.37%
1.26%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWZ vs. FCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FCAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWZ vs. FCAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PWZ
FCAL
PWZ vs. FCAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PWZ vs. FCAL - Dividend Comparison
PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than FCAL's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.28% | 2.84% | 2.49% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 2.49% | 2.86% | 3.16% | 3.80% |
FCAL First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF | 3.19% | 2.99% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.03% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWZ vs. FCAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than FCAL's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and FCAL.
Loading data...
Volatility
PWZ vs. FCAL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) at 0.96%. This indicates that PWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...