PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWV vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWV vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 8.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWV having a 12.23% annualized return and VOOV not far behind at 12.04%.


PWV

1D
1.05%
1M
5.28%
YTD
16.03%
6M
15.49%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
21.20%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
12.23%

VOOV

1D
0.67%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.31%
6M
8.06%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWV vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
16.03%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
8.31%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PWV and VOOV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.92

The correlation between PWV and VOOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWV vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWV vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWVVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.37

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

3.31

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.94

12.58

+11.36

PWV vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWV Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWV and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWV vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWVVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.04%

-37.31%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-6.27%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-17.55%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-18.10%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.67%

-37.31%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-3.84%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.65%

-0.45%

Volatility

PWV vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWVVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.76%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

7.28%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

9.97%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

14.48%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.95%

+0.21%

PWV vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWV vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VOOV's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.66%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWV and VOOV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOV has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to PWV (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 12.23% vs 12.04% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 12.23% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.66% for VOOV.

PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.07% for VOOV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWV and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer