PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWV vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWV vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PWV has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 11.81%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.09% annualized return.


PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%

UPRO

1D
-2.09%
1M
14.64%
YTD
27.90%
6M
26.67%
1Y
80.84%
3Y*
52.58%
5Y*
23.13%
10Y*
30.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWV vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
27.90%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PWV and UPRO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between PWV and UPRO has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWV vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWV vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWVUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

3.03

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.16

12.80

+8.36

PWV vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWV and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWVUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.30

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.46

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.56

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.65

-0.24

Drawdowns

PWV vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWVUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.04%

-76.82%

+27.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-26.78%

+22.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-48.87%

+34.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-63.94%

+47.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.67%

-76.82%

+39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-2.09%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-14.42%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

6.33%

-5.13%

Volatility

PWV vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 2.35%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWVUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

8.45%

-6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.62%

26.60%

-19.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

35.35%

-26.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

50.32%

-35.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

53.74%

-36.58%

PWV vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWV vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than UPRO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.68%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWV and UPRO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.09% vs 11.81% for PWV. On fees, PWV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.09% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.68% for UPRO.

PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.89% for UPRO.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWV and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer