PWV vs. MUU
PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PWV returned 29.15% vs 2796.55% for MUU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
PWV vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.
PWV
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
MUU
- 1D
- -9.01%
- 1M
- -18.36%
- 6M
- 372.65%
- YTD
- 575.80%
- 1Y
- 2,796.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWV vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 19.38% | 19.65% | -2.80% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 575.80% | 599.03% | -40.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and MUU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024 | 0.18 |
The correlation between PWV and MUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
MUU
PWV vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -20.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.69 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.22 | 66.09 | -58.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.93 | 221.31 | -196.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -75.07% | +26.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -52.72% | +48.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.32% | +36.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -23.43% | +13.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 16.57% | -15.40% |
Volatility
PWV vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 3.82%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 67.81% | -63.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 116.35% | -109.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 145.78% | -136.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 138.10% | -123.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 138.10% | -120.97% |
PWV vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.70% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.68% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and MUU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to PWV (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs 29.15% for PWV. On fees, PWV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs 29.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.
PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 1.01% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer