PWV vs. LVHI
PWV (Invesco Large Cap Value ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while LVHI is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 12.37%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for LVHI. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PWV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
PWV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 18.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWV having a 12.37% annualized return and LVHI not far behind at 11.87%.
PWV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 18.00%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 31.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.53%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.17M | $30.23M | $26.64M | |
| $10.04M | $7.39M | $4.81M |
PWV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | -3.77% | 29.84% | -14.12% | 16.98% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 18.29% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and LVHI is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PWV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
LVHI
PWV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.71 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.91 | 5.76 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.36 | 24.05 | +4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -32.31% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -6.08% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -11.99% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -11.99% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | -32.31% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.70% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -3.47% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 1.45% | -0.32% |
Volatility
PWV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.48%. This indicates that PWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.48% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 7.58% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 9.46% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 11.05% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 13.70% | +3.44% |
PWV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than LVHI's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.51% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to LVHI (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 12.37% vs 11.87% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PWV.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.65% for PWV.
PWV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LVHI is Dividend. PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PWV and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 3.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer