PWV vs. FUNL
PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PWV is passively managed, while FUNL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWV returned 12.50%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.
Performance
PWV vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.
PWV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
FUNL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PWV vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 12.10% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | 12.95% |
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 5.66% | 14.62% | 15.55% | 14.33% | -5.76% | 25.93% | 14.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and FUNL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PWV and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
FUNL
PWV vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWV | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 5.01 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.16 | 23.31 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWV | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.19 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.63 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.95 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
PWV vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than FUNL's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and FUNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -19.35% | -29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -3.83% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -17.37% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -19.35% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.12% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -3.54% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.82% | +0.38% |
Volatility
PWV vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that PWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 0.00% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.62% | 5.24% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 8.82% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 15.16% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 15.29% | +1.87% |
PWV vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 2.25% | 2.10% | 1.78% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and FUNL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs FUNL's -19.35%.
On 5-year performance, PWV leads with 12.50% vs 9.42% for FUNL. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PWV has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.81% for PWV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PWV and 0.50% for FUNL.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and FUNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer