PWV vs. CSTK
PWV (Invesco Large Cap Value ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Invesco. PWV is passively managed, while CSTK is actively managed. Over the past year, PWV returned 33.04% vs 27.12% for CSTK. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PWV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.
Performance
PWV vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than CSTK's 15.85% return.
PWV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.52%
CSTK
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- YTD
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $126.36K | $157.28K | $227.65K | |
| $10.73M | $7.77M | $4.99M |
PWV vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 21.38% | 17.33% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 15.85% | 18.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and CSTK is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PWV and CSTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
CSTK
PWV vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.43 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.19 | 3.07 | +5.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.29 | 12.24 | +17.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and CSTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -8.87% | -40.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -8.87% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | 0.00% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -1.17% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 2.22% | -1.09% |
Volatility
PWV vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.59% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 8.44% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 11.30% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 11.39% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 11.39% | +5.75% |
PWV vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than CSTK's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 2.11% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and CSTK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to CSTK (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs CSTK's -8.87%.
On 1-year performance, PWV leads with 33.04% vs 27.12% for CSTK. On fees, CSTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PWV has performed better with a 33.04% return vs 27.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PWV.
CSTK has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.65% for PWV.
Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PWV and 0.35% for CSTK.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and CSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer