CSTK vs. FUNL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL).

CSTK and FUNL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSTK is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025. FUNL is an actively managed fund by CornerCap. It was launched on Aug 19, 2020.

Performance

CSTK vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSTK vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	0.02%	18.33%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	17.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSTK achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FUNL's 5.66% return.

CSTK

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 4.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 21.44%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSTK vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

FUNL

CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL

CSTK

Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CSTK vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 73
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSTK vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSTK	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	0.97	+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between CSTK and FUNL is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CSTK vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

CSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	1.97%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Drawdowns

CSTK vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSTK drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTK and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSTK	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-19.35%	+10.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.78%	-0.12%	-6.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-3.64%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSTK	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.70%	16.12%	-4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.70%	15.29%	-3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.70%	15.53%	-3.83%