PWS vs. THRV
PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PWS is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWS charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
PWS vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than THRV's 1.71% return.
PWS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 9.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWS vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 0.35% | 1.30% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.71% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWS and THRV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWS vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
PWS
THRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PWS vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWS vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -1.50% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -0.66% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -0.44% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility
PWS vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 2.95% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 2.95% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 2.95% | +11.42% |
PWS vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWS vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than THRV's 5.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.31% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 5.41% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWS and THRV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 1.31% for PWS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWS and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for PWS and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer