PWS vs. THRV
PWS (Pacer WealthShield ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PWS is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWS charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
PWS vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWS achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than THRV's 1.86% return.
PWS
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWS vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | -2.18% | 1.25% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWS and THRV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWS vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
PWS
THRV
PWS vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.04 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
PWS vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWS drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWS and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -1.50% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -0.51% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -0.44% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | — | — |
Volatility
PWS vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWS | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 2.92% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 2.92% | +9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 2.92% | +11.47% |
PWS vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWS vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
PWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWS Pacer WealthShield ETF | 1.49% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 2.21% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.53% | 1.77% | 1.16% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWS and THRV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.49% for PWS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWS and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for PWS and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer