PWRZ vs. IFRA
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. PWRZ is actively managed, while IFRA is passively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IFRA
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.31M | $22.83M | $23.65M | |
| $5.57K | $7.64K | $7.64K |
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -2.28% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRZ and IFRA is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IFRA
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, smaller than the maximum IFRA drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -41.06% | +37.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -6.38% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -5.09% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 15.39% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 17.87% | -5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 21.30% | -9.31% |
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRZ and IFRA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFRA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFRA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.30% for IFRA.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer