PWRD vs. HAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRD is actively managed, while HAP is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.

Performance

PWRD vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly lower than HAP's 21.49% return.

PWRD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 19.81%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAP

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 23.70%
• 1Y: 46.66%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	19.81%	7.66%
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.49%	18.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and HAP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

PWRD vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 89
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWRD	HAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.26	+1.06

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and HAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRD	HAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-50.73%	+36.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.95%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-12.03%	+8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWRD	HAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.03%	14.91%	+9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.03%	18.24%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.03%	19.74%	+4.29%

PWRD vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRD vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWRD and HAP in my portfolio?

PWRD and HAP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PWRD or HAP?

On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRD or HAP?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRD or HAP?

HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between PWRD and HAP?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.42% for HAP.