PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWRD vs. AIFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWRD vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 32.00% return.


PWRD

1D
-2.91%
1M
-4.26%
6M
9.17%
YTD
14.65%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
10Y*

AIFD

1D
-3.23%
1M
-7.56%
6M
30.36%
YTD
32.00%
1Y
60.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
14.65%32.84%6.43%
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
32.00%28.30%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and AIFD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024

0.79

The correlation between PWRD and AIFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWRD vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AIFD
AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRDAIFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

4.50

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

15.50

-10.38

PWRD vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRD and AIFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum AIFD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and AIFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRDAIFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.87%

-33.20%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-13.42%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-13.42%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-5.82%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

3.89%

+0.63%

Volatility

PWRD vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) have volatilities of 12.09% and 11.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRDAIFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

11.77%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

23.87%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

29.13%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

30.30%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

30.30%

-7.07%

PWRD vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PWRD and AIFD have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

PWRD vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

PWRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.06%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWRD and AIFD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to AIFD (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs AIFD's -33.20%.

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 60.10% vs 23.10% for PWRD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, AIFD has been the lower-risk option at 11.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 60.10% return vs 23.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWRD and AIFD have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

PWRD has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while AIFD is Technology Equities.

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWRD and AIFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer