PWLIX vs. VOO
PWLIX (PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - PWLIX is a Long-Short fund managed by PIMCO, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX returned 4.46%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWLIX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
PWLIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWLIX achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
PWLIX
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
PWLIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | -1.50% | 4.64% | 4.65% | 4.04% | 4.33% | 15.15% | -12.66% | 9.60% | 0.49% | 11.80% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWLIX and VOO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014 | 0.23 |
The correlation between PWLIX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWLIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PWLIX
VOO
PWLIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWLIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.67 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 11.96 | -11.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWLIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWLIX drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWLIX and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWLIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -33.99% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -8.90% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.74% | -18.69% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.74% | -24.52% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.92% | -33.99% | +7.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.05% | -3.14% | -6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.68% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.99% | +1.67% |
Volatility
PWLIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) is 3.28%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that PWLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWLIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 4.83% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 9.82% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.88% | 12.46% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 16.91% | -7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 18.02% | -8.99% |
PWLIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWLIX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWLIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 5.00% | 6.65% | 4.75% | 5.51% | 14.75% | 11.99% | 7.31% | 6.79% | 0.39% | 10.82% | 4.16% | 3.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWLIX and VOO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PWLIX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWLIX dropped -26.92% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWLIX and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer