PWLIX vs. SAOAX
PWLIX (PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund) and SAOAX (Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX returned 4.46%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for SAOAX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWLIX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for SAOAX.
Performance
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWLIX achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than SAOAX's 11.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX has outperformed SAOAX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while SAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return.
PWLIX
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
SAOAX
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | -1.50% | 4.64% | 4.65% | 4.04% | 4.33% | 15.15% | -12.66% | 9.60% | 0.49% | 11.80% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 11.44% | -2.00% | 10.49% | 8.81% | -8.66% | 14.38% | 0.17% | -2.26% | -11.25% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWLIX and SAOAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWLIX vs. SAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
PWLIX
SAOAX
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWLIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.27 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.35 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 7.26 | -7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWLIX drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum SAOAX drawdown of -52.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWLIX and SAOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWLIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -52.28% | +25.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -5.90% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.74% | -35.90% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.74% | -35.90% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.92% | -35.90% | +8.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.05% | -5.90% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -8.69% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.91% | +1.75% |
Volatility
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) is 3.28%, while Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that PWLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWLIX | SAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.77% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 6.98% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.88% | 9.16% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 28.73% | -19.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 21.17% | -12.14% |
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWLIX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SAOAX's 1.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWLIX vs. SAOAX - Dividend Comparison
PWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than SAOAX's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 5.00% | 6.65% | 4.75% | 5.51% | 14.75% | 11.99% | 7.31% | 6.79% | 0.39% | 10.82% | 4.16% | 3.61% |
SAOAX Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund | 0.64% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 7.07% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWLIX and SAOAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAOAX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to PWLIX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWLIX dropped -26.92% vs SAOAX's -52.28%.
SAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWLIX and SAOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer