PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSA vs. FNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSA vs. FNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than FNX's 14.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has underperformed FNX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while FNX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.


TUSA

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
6.18%
6M
4.93%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.96%

FNX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.65%
YTD
14.46%
6M
11.83%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.18%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
14.46%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and FNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.69

The correlation between TUSA and FNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUSA
FNX

Financial Services

31.9%
18.7%

Industrials

19.8%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
15.4%

Basic Materials

14.1%
3.2%

Utilities

7.5%
2.8%

Technology

6.1%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.1%
7.1%

Healthcare

2.0%
10.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.4%

Energy

1.9%
5.7%

Financial Services

TUSA
31.9%
FNX
18.7%

Industrials

TUSA
19.8%
FNX
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TUSA
16.0%
FNX
15.4%

Basic Materials

TUSA
14.1%
FNX
3.2%

Utilities

TUSA
7.5%
FNX
2.8%

Technology

TUSA
6.1%
FNX
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

TUSA
4.1%
FNX
3.2%

Real Estate

TUSA
2.1%
FNX
7.1%

Healthcare

TUSA
2.0%
FNX
10.1%

Communication Services

TUSA
2.0%
FNX
2.4%

Energy

TUSA
1.9%
FNX
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSA vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSAFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.17

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

10.89

-3.62

TUSA vs. FNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and FNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and FNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSAFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.53%

-57.11%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-9.24%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-24.97%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-24.97%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-43.95%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

0.00%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-8.38%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.68%

-0.12%

Volatility

TUSA vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) is 3.03%, while First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that TUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSAFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

4.52%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

11.70%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

16.41%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

20.51%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

21.99%

-1.84%

TUSA vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FNX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSA vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than FNX's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.81%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSA and FNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to TUSA (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs FNX's -57.11%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 12.51% vs 10.96% for TUSA. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.81% for FNX.

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.60% for FNX.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSA and FNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer