PWC vs. IQSM
PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) and IQSM (IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index while IQSM tracks the IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PWC returned 13.71%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for IQSM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IQSM.
Performance
PWC vs. IQSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than IQSM's 11.77% return.
PWC
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IQSM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWC vs. IQSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.85% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | 0.91% |
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 11.77% | 7.97% | 9.15% | 15.82% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWC and IQSM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PWC and IQSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PWC vs. IQSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWC
IQSM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
PWC
IQSM
Financial Services
PWC
IQSM
Healthcare
PWC
IQSM
Consumer Cyclical
PWC
IQSM
Industrials
PWC
IQSM
Communication Services
PWC
IQSM
Consumer Defensive
PWC
IQSM
Real Estate
PWC
IQSM
Energy
PWC
IQSM
Basic Materials
PWC
IQSM
Utilities
PWC
IQSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWC vs. IQSM — Risk / Return Rank
PWC
IQSM
PWC vs. IQSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWC | IQSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.58 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 9.43 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWC | IQSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.53 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.74 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
PWC vs. IQSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than IQSM's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and IQSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWC | IQSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -23.66% | -54.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -8.86% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -23.66% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | 0.00% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.21% | -4.87% | -31.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.42% | -0.32% |
Volatility
PWC vs. IQSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 2.14%, while IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWC | IQSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 3.97% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 10.98% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 14.97% | -5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 17.89% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 17.89% | +0.92% |
PWC vs. IQSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWC vs. IQSM - Dividend Comparison
PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than IQSM's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWC and IQSM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSM has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to PWC (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs IQSM's -23.66%.
On 3-year performance, IQSM leads with 13.84% vs 13.71% for PWC. On fees, IQSM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IQSM has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 13.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.06% for IQSM.
PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while IQSM tracks IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.15% for IQSM.
IQSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWC and IQSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer