IQSM vs. LRND

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IQSM (IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while LRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQSM returned 13.88%/yr vs 21.07%/yr for LRND. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQSM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for LRND.

Performance

IQSM vs. LRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than LRND's 7.55% return.

IQSM

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 24.75%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRND

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: 7.55%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 21.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSM vs. LRND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	12.62%	7.97%	9.15%	15.82%	2.29%
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	7.55%	20.31%	21.68%	44.13%	-1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSM and LRND is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022	0.72

The correlation between IQSM and LRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSM vs. LRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQSM	LRND
Industrials	20.9%	5.1%
Technology	18.9%	60.4%
Healthcare	14.0%	9.8%
Financial Services	12.1%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	7.6%
Real Estate	9.5%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	1.7%
Communication Services	3.3%	14.7%
Energy	1.4%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

IQSM vs. LRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSM

IQSM Risk / Return Rank: 52
IQSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IQSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IQSM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IQSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IQSM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LRND

LRND Risk / Return Rank: 47
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 48
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSM vs. LRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IQSM	LRND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.71	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.34	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	1.99	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	7.63	+2.60

IQSM vs. LRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the LRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSM and LRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IQSM vs. LRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum LRND drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and LRND.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSM	LRND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-25.43%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-13.83%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-21.06%	-2.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-5.07%	+4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-6.22%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	3.60%	-1.17%

Volatility

IQSM vs. LRND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) is 4.24%, while IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that IQSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSM	LRND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	6.18%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	12.89%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	16.06%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	20.05%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	20.05%	-2.17%

IQSM vs. LRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LRND's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IQSM vs. LRND - Dividend Comparison

IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than LRND's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.07%	1.18%	1.22%	1.11%	0.32%
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	0.51%	0.67%	0.97%	1.22%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSM and LRND in my portfolio?

IQSM and LRND have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQSM or LRND?

LRND has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to IQSM (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSM dropped -23.66% vs LRND's -25.43%.

Which ETF is better, IQSM or LRND?

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 21.07% vs 13.88% for IQSM. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, IQSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQSM or LRND?

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 21.07% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSM or LRND?

LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IQSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQSM or LRND?

IQSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.51% for LRND.

What is the main difference between IQSM and LRND?

IQSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while LRND is Large Cap Blend Equities. IQSM tracks IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSM and 0.14% for LRND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.