PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWC vs. DEUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWC vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PWC has underperformed DEUS with an annualized return of 9.55%, while DEUS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


PWC

1D
0.27%
1M
3.19%
6M
5.07%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
9.55%
ALL TIME*
2.96%

DEUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.84%
6M
10.76%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$638.57K$826.95K$989.73K
$45.96K$66.92K$59.96K

PWC vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
10.69%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
15.73%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-9.16%20.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PWC and DEUS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.86

The correlation between PWC and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PWC vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PWC
DEUS

Financial Services

16.9%
13.8%

Industrials

14.4%
18.7%

Technology

14.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

10.9%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
11.1%

Communication Services

7.3%
3.2%

Energy

5.8%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.5%
4.1%

Utilities

5.3%
7.4%

Real Estate

5.3%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
7.5%

Financial Services

PWC
16.9%
DEUS
13.8%

Industrials

PWC
14.4%
DEUS
18.7%

Technology

PWC
14.2%
DEUS
10.5%

Healthcare

PWC
10.9%
DEUS
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PWC
7.4%
DEUS
11.1%

Communication Services

PWC
7.3%
DEUS
3.2%

Energy

PWC
5.8%
DEUS
5.2%

Basic Materials

PWC
5.5%
DEUS
4.1%

Utilities

PWC
5.3%
DEUS
7.4%

Real Estate

PWC
5.3%
DEUS
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

PWC
5.3%
DEUS
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWC vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PWC vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWCDEUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.19

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

12.26

-5.45

PWC vs. DEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the DEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWC and DEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWC vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than DEUS's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and DEUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWCDEUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-40.47%

-37.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-6.83%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-16.69%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-20.89%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-40.47%

+1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.01%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.96%

-4.28%

-31.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.77%

+0.38%

Volatility

PWC vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 3.05%. This indicates that PWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWCDEUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.05%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

8.23%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

11.14%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

15.49%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

17.95%

+0.79%

PWC vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWC vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison

PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than DEUS's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.38%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%0.00%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.71%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWC and DEUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWC has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to DEUS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs DEUS's -40.47%.

On 10-year performance, DEUS leads with 11.41% vs 9.55% for PWC. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.38% for DEUS.

PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWC and DEUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer