PWB vs. SOXQ
PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PWB returned 34.49%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PWB vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 28.68% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PWB
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 10.94%
- YTD
- 28.68%
- 6M
- 28.89%
- 1Y
- 45.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 18.47%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWB vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 28.68% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 12.98% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and SOXQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PWB and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
PWB vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWB
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
PWB
SOXQ
Industrials
PWB
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PWB
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PWB
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
PWB
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PWB
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PWB
SOXQ
-
Utilities
PWB
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PWB
SOXQ
-
Energy
PWB
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PWB
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWB vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PWB
SOXQ
PWB vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWB | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.72 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 11.73 | -7.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.42 | 45.01 | -28.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWB | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 5.43 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.98 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PWB vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWB | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -46.01% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -15.59% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -39.36% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -12.96% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.06% | -1.26% |
Volatility
PWB vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 5.38%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWB | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 13.44% | -8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 26.70% | -11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 33.78% | -15.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 36.38% | -15.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 36.38% | -15.67% |
PWB vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWB vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWB and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PWB (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 34.49% for PWB. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 34.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.
PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWB and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer