PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVL vs. EME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PVL vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVL achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 42.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PVL has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 1.75%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 34.23% annualized return.


PVL

1D
-0.56%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
2.40%
6M
4.87%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
-2.49%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
1.75%

EME

1D
3.86%
1M
2.35%
YTD
42.18%
6M
39.88%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
70.85%
5Y*
48.61%
10Y*
34.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVL vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
2.40%42.17%-0.62%-50.32%81.37%205.27%-56.49%10.22%-32.22%-3.06%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
42.18%35.05%111.27%46.03%16.81%39.93%6.47%45.18%-26.68%16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PVL and EME is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2011

0.13

The correlation between PVL and EME shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PVL:

$0.14

EME:

$29.65

PE Ratio

PVL:

12.60

EME:

29.31

PEG Ratio

PVL:

0.18

EME:

0.68

PS Ratio

PVL:

9.44

EME:

2.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

PVL:

$4.69M

EME:

$17.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PVL:

$4.28M

EME:

$3.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

PVL:

$3.49M

EME:

$2.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVL vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVL
PVL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EME
EME Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVL vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PVLEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.18

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

7.75

-6.81

PVL vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVL Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVL and EME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PVL vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVL drawdown since its inception was -95.05%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVL and EME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVLEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.05%

-70.56%

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.52%

-25.15%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.42%

-36.19%

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.24%

-36.19%

-41.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.54%

-48.00%

-37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.33%

-7.93%

-61.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-15.36%

-48.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

10.29%

-4.06%

Volatility

PVL vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) is 7.63%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 10.72%. This indicates that PVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVLEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

10.72%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.36%

26.27%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.43%

38.91%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.72%

33.43%

+17.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.71%

33.07%

+22.64%

Dividends

PVL vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

PVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than EME's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.15%0.16%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
9.78%7.20%6.29%25.67%13.18%5.66%18.35%16.57%22.27%6.61%6.63%15.66%

Financials

PVL vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permianville Royalty Trust and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B202220232024202520260
4.63B
(PVL) Total Revenue
(EME) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PVL and EME have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EME has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to PVL (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVL dropped -95.05% vs EME's -70.56%.

EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVL and EME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer