PVAL vs. SCHC
PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). PVAL is actively managed, while SCHC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PVAL returned 16.29%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for SCHC. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PVAL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
PVAL vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 9.25% return.
PVAL
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
PVAL vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 13.07% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.77% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVAL and SCHC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between PVAL and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
PVAL vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PVAL
SCHC
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PVAL
SCHC
Healthcare
PVAL
SCHC
Industrials
PVAL
SCHC
Technology
PVAL
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
PVAL
SCHC
Energy
PVAL
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
PVAL
SCHC
Communication Services
PVAL
SCHC
Utilities
PVAL
SCHC
Basic Materials
PVAL
SCHC
Real Estate
PVAL
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVAL vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
PVAL
SCHC
PVAL vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PVAL | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.27 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 1.93 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 7.12 | +9.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PVAL vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVAL | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -43.94% | +27.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -12.48% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -15.52% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -36.48% | +19.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.49% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -10.04% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 3.38% | -1.48% |
Volatility
PVAL vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is 3.68%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that PVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVAL | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 6.31% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 13.88% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 16.21% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 17.62% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 18.02% | -2.77% |
PVAL vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
PVAL vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SCHC's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVAL and SCHC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PVAL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 16.29% vs 6.10% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.97% for PVAL.
PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 0.11% for SCHC.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVAL and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer