PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist (LDAX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than LDAX.DE's 1.18% return.


PUST.PA

1D
-2.34%
1M
-3.91%
6M
13.24%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
20.05%

LDAX.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.09%
6M
-1.89%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
1.71%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
15.40%5.71%35.33%50.06%-29.76%38.74%13.09%
LDAX.DE
Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist
1.18%22.70%18.08%19.61%-12.89%15.29%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PUST.PA and LDAX.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020

0.56

The correlation between PUST.PA and LDAX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUST.PA
PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LDAX.DE
LDAX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LDAX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDAX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDAX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LDAX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDAX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist (LDAX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUST.PALDAX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.03

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

0.14

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

0.44

+6.63

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the LDAX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUST.PA and LDAX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than LDAX.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and LDAX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUST.PALDAX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-26.68%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-12.36%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-15.92%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-26.68%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-3.53%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-4.79%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.93%

-0.35%

Volatility

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist (LDAX.DE) at 4.62%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUST.PALDAX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

4.62%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

13.61%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

16.26%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

17.23%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

17.36%

+2.44%

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LDAX.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUST.PA vs. LDAX.DE - Dividend Comparison

PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LDAX.DE
Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist
1.93%1.95%2.31%2.73%3.32%2.73%0.39%
PUST.PA
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUST.PA and LDAX.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDAX.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDAX.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PUST.PA.

PUST.PA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LDAX.DE is Europe Equities. PUST.PA tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LDAX.DE tracks DAX®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for PUST.PA and 0.15% for LDAX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and LDAX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer