PUSH vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
PUSH and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
PUSH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PUSH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF | 0.64% | 4.16% | 1.74% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 8.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUSH achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.
PUSH
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PUSH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PUSH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
PUSH
VOO
PUSH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 0.98 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | 1.50 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.23 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 1.53 | +2.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 7.29 | +8.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 0.98 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 0.83 | +2.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PUSH and VOO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PUSH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF | 3.60% | 3.45% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
PUSH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -33.99% | +33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.85% | -11.98% | +11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -6.29% | +5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -3.72% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 2.52% | -2.28% |
Volatility
PUSH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) is 0.23%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that PUSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PUSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 5.29% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 9.44% | -8.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 18.10% | -16.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 16.82% | -15.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 17.99% | -16.66% |