PUSH vs. GUMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI).

PUSH and GUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. GUMI is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024.

Performance

PUSH vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PUSH vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	0.65%	4.16%	1.29%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	0.67%	3.39%	1.52%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PUSH having a 0.65% return and GUMI slightly higher at 0.67%.

PUSH

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GUMI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 3.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUSH vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GUMI

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF

PUSH

PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PUSH vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 95
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GUMI

GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 98
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUSH vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUSH	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.82	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	4.39	-1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.62	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	6.88	-2.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.49	29.42	-13.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUSH vs. GUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the GUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUSH and GUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUSH	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.82	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.84	3.32	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between PUSH and GUMI is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PUSH vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than GUMI's 2.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.31%	3.45%	1.86%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	2.81%	2.95%	1.37%

Drawdowns

PUSH vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUSH drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUSH and GUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUSH	GUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-0.48%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.85%	-0.48%	-0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.04%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-0.05%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	0.11%	+0.13%

Volatility

PUSH vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) has a higher volatility of 0.23% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.18%. This indicates that PUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUSH	GUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.23%	0.18%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.03%	0.75%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64%	1.15%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.33%	1.01%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.33%	1.01%	+0.32%