PUMP vs. BTDR
PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) and BTDR (Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares) are both stocks. PUMP operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while BTDR operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, PUMP returned 23.60%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for BTDR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PUMP vs. BTDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUMP achieves a 56.26% return, which is significantly lower than BTDR's 59.86% return.
PUMP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -17.58%
- YTD
- 56.26%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 121.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BTDR
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 36.27%
- YTD
- 59.86%
- 6M
- 83.61%
- 1Y
- 41.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PUMP vs. BTDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 56.26% | 1.93% | 11.34% | 10.41% |
BTDR Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares | 59.86% | -48.27% | 119.78% | 20.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUMP and BTDR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2023 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
PUMP:
$1.74B
BTDR:
$4.18B
PUMP:
-$0.22
BTDR:
-$2.23
PUMP:
1.76
BTDR:
5.48
PUMP:
1.76
BTDR:
5.73
PUMP:
$909.74M
BTDR:
$739.06M
PUMP:
$79.21M
BTDR:
$25.18M
PUMP:
$158.47M
BTDR:
$59.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUMP vs. BTDR — Risk / Return Rank
PUMP
BTDR
PUMP vs. BTDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PUMP | BTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 0.57 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 0.96 | +7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PUMP vs. BTDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUMP drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than BTDR's maximum drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUMP and BTDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUMP | BTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -79.52% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.03% | -71.89% | +39.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.13% | -79.52% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.74% | -31.34% | -8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -43.57% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.85% | 42.92% | -28.07% |
Volatility
PUMP vs. BTDR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) is 17.63%, while Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) has a volatility of 29.97%. This indicates that PUMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUMP | BTDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.63% | 29.97% | -12.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.69% | 68.18% | -28.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.15% | 100.57% | -21.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.17% | 123.09% | -60.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.94% | 123.09% | -52.15% |
Dividends
PUMP vs. BTDR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PUMP nor BTDR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PUMP vs. BTDR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ProPetro Holding Corp. and Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PUMP and BTDR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTDR has higher volatility (29.97%) compared to PUMP (17.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUMP dropped -93.88% vs BTDR's -79.52%.
PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PUMP and BTDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer