PULS vs. GEV
PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while GEV (GE Vernova Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, PULS returned 4.47% vs 88.32% for GEV. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PULS vs. GEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 65.43% return.
PULS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.33%
GEV
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 58.52%
- YTD
- 65.43%
- 1Y
- 88.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 163.70%
PULS vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.20% | 4.97% | 4.50% |
GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 65.43% | 99.02% | 186.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and GEV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULS vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank
PULS
GEV
PULS vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PULS | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +24.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.22 | 1.29 | +4.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 49.94 | 3.61 | +46.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 282.15 | 10.19 | +271.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PULS vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, smaller than the maximum GEV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and GEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULS | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -38.29% | +32.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.09% | -24.57% | +24.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -8.14% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -7.02% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 8.70% | -8.68% |
Volatility
PULS vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) is 0.12%, while GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a volatility of 18.23%. This indicates that PULS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULS | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | 18.23% | -18.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 35.99% | -35.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 52.15% | -51.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.70% | 54.00% | -53.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 54.00% | -52.68% |
Dividends
PULS vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than GEV's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 0.19% | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULS and GEV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEV has higher volatility (18.23%) compared to PULS (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULS dropped -5.85% vs GEV's -38.29%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.45 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULS and GEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer