PULS vs. COST
PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PULS returned 4.24%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for COST. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PULS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.87% return.
PULS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
COST
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.83B | $2.11B | $2.34B | |
| $149.74M | $124.03M | $127.61M |
PULS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.36% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.48% | 1.47% | 2.97% | 1.71% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 10.87% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and COST is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PULS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
PULS
COST
PULS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PULS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +26.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.25 | 1.03 | +5.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 50.21 | 0.12 | +50.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 283.67 | 0.26 | +283.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PULS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PULS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -53.39% | +47.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.09% | -16.57% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.34% | -20.74% | +20.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.79% | -31.40% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.88% | +12.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -13.36% | +13.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 7.81% | -7.79% |
Volatility
PULS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) is 0.10%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that PULS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PULS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 7.34% | -7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.32% | 15.13% | -14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43% | 19.96% | -19.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.70% | 22.93% | -22.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.32% | 22.03% | -20.71% |
Dividends
PULS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than COST's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.72% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.87% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PULS and COST have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to PULS (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PULS dropped -5.85% vs COST's -53.39%.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.51 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PULS and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer