PUI vs. JMOM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PUI (Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PUI tracks the DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PUI returned 9.60%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for JMOM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PUI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.

Performance

PUI vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 21.70% return.

PUI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

JMOM

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 21.70%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: 34.10%
• 3Y*: 27.39%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUI vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PUI Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF	9.29%	15.25%	23.91%	-4.47%	-2.17%	15.02%	-5.05%	20.95%	6.12%	-3.89%
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	21.70%	18.02%	28.47%	22.89%	-20.83%	25.03%	29.25%	28.24%	-5.25%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PUI and JMOM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.42

PUI vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PUI	JMOM
Utilities	77.9%	2.0%
Energy	10.1%	3.3%
Industrials	9.9%	12.0%
Communication Services	2.1%	7.7%
Financial Services	0.1%	9.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Healthcare	-	8.1%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Technology	-	43.1%

Return for Risk

PUI vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUI

PUI Risk / Return Rank: 28
PUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PUI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PUI Martin Ratio Rank: 25

JMOM

JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUI vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PUI	JMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.19	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	2.95	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.38	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.35	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.20	19.57	-16.37

PUI vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUI Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUI and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PUI vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and JMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUI	JMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.20%	-34.31%	-8.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-7.87%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.28%	-19.51%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.47%	-28.26%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-2.53%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.45%	-6.29%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	1.75%	+3.11%

Volatility

PUI vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) is 4.70%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that PUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUI	JMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	7.29%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	13.12%	-2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	15.69%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	18.87%	-2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	20.19%	-1.10%

PUI vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

PUI vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.72%	0.86%	0.75%	1.21%	1.39%	0.64%	0.85%	1.11%	1.38%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%
PUI Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF	1.98%	2.22%	2.06%	2.36%	2.16%	2.03%	2.42%	2.02%	1.87%	2.98%	3.35%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUI and JMOM in my portfolio?

PUI and JMOM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUI or JMOM?

JMOM has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to PUI (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUI dropped -43.20% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

Which ETF is better, PUI or JMOM?

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.10% vs 9.60% for PUI. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PUI has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PUI or JMOM?

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PUI or JMOM?

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PUI or JMOM?

PUI has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.

What is the main difference between PUI and JMOM?

PUI tracks DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.12% for JMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.