PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTRB vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTRB vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTRB vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
-0.15%7.63%2.67%7.71%-4.81%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
-0.51%6.25%9.40%13.75%1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRB achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than PFRL's -0.51% return.


PTRB

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
1.06%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTRB vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTRB vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRB
PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRB vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTRBPFRLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.63

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

0.77

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.67

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

6.10

-1.39

PTRB vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the PFRL Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRB and PFRL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTRBPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.63

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.57

-1.53

Correlation

The correlation between PTRB and PFRL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PTRB vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than PFRL's 7.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
5.18%4.73%5.10%4.62%4.07%0.12%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
7.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%0.00%

Drawdowns

PTRB vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, which is greater than PFRL's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRB and PFRL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTRBPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-8.83%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-7.87%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.78%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-0.46%

-7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.86%

+0.19%

Volatility

PTRB vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) at 0.74%. This indicates that PTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTRBPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

0.74%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

1.61%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

8.53%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

4.96%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

4.96%

+1.36%