PTNQ vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTNQ tracks the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.

PTNQ

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -3.51%
• 6M: 4.32%
• YTD: 5.52%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 14.82%
• ALL TIME*: 12.12%

GXLC

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$27.98K	$20.23K	$17.31K
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	$3.10M	$2.47M	$2.76M

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	5.52%	2.69%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	10.06%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PTNQ and GXLC is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

PTNQ vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTNQ	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	—	—

Drawdowns

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTNQ	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.07%	-9.08%	-18.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.71%	-1.48%	-6.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-1.58%	-4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PTNQ	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.70%	13.60%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	13.60%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	13.60%	+3.02%

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTNQ vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than GXLC's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.84%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTNQ and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PTNQ and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PTNQ or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTNQ or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTNQ or GXLC?

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between PTNQ and GXLC?

PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.02% for GXLC.