PTNQ vs. BUL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTNQ returned 11.75%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for BUL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BUL.

Performance

PTNQ vs. BUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than BUL's 9.56% return.

PTNQ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 8.66%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 31.85%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

BUL

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 11.09%
• 1Y: 26.04%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTNQ vs. BUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	13.51%	7.18%	15.47%	34.65%	-16.00%	13.16%	29.38%	11.62%
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	9.56%	19.18%	27.39%	3.68%	-16.18%	32.48%	27.26%	4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PTNQ and BUL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019	0.68

The correlation between PTNQ and BUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTNQ vs. BUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTNQ	BUL
Technology	53.2%	28.3%
Communication Services	16.1%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	22.3%
Healthcare	5.3%	21.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	2.3%
Industrials	4.3%	13.4%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	5.7%
Energy	0.5%	5.1%
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

PTNQ vs. BUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 51
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTNQ vs. BUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTNQ	BUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.56	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.32	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.93	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	10.59	-1.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTNQ vs. BUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTNQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the BUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTNQ and BUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTNQ	BUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.56	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.52	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.59	+0.22

Drawdowns

PTNQ vs. BUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum BUL drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and BUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTNQ	BUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.07%	-37.08%	+9.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-8.93%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.19%	-23.55%	+9.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	-27.85%	+9.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	0.00%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-7.64%	+1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.46%	+1.00%

Volatility

PTNQ vs. BUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is 4.64%, while Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that PTNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTNQ	BUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	5.26%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	11.89%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	16.76%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.89%	21.79%	-8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	24.24%	-7.87%

PTNQ vs. BUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BUL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTNQ vs. BUL - Dividend Comparison

PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than BUL's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.24%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.78%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTNQ and BUL in my portfolio?

PTNQ and BUL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTNQ or BUL?

BUL has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to PTNQ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs BUL's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, PTNQ or BUL?

On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 11.75% vs 11.37% for BUL. On fees, BUL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTNQ or BUL?

Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTNQ or BUL?

BUL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTNQ or BUL?

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.24% for BUL.

What is the main difference between PTNQ and BUL?

PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.60% for BUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.