PTNQ vs. BUL
PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTNQ returned 10.52%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for BUL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BUL.
Performance
PTNQ vs. BUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than BUL's 6.24% return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
BUL
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ vs. BUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 9.80% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 13.40% |
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 6.24% | 19.18% | 27.39% | 3.68% | -16.18% | 32.48% | 27.26% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and BUL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PTNQ and BUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. BUL — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
BUL
PTNQ vs. BUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTNQ | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.45 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 8.64 | -1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. BUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum BUL drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and BUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -37.08% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -8.93% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -23.55% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -27.85% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -3.03% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -7.60% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.53% | +1.04% |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. BUL - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) at 5.32%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 5.32% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 12.55% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 17.01% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 21.87% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 24.21% | -7.70% |
PTNQ vs. BUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BUL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. BUL - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than BUL's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 2.11% | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.80% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTNQ and BUL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to BUL (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs BUL's -37.08%.
On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 10.52% vs 10.08% for BUL. On fees, BUL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUL has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.22% for BUL.
PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.60% for BUL.
PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTNQ and BUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer