PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than VXF's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 5.91%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.


PTMC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
12.33%
6M
11.93%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.91%

VXF

1D
-3.32%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
11.25%
6M
9.53%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
12.33%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
11.25%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and VXF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.75

The correlation between PTMC and VXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTMC vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTMC
VXF

Industrials

23.6%
19.3%

Technology

16.4%
19.8%

Financial Services

15.1%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
13.3%

Real Estate

7.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.7%

Energy

4.2%
5.1%

Utilities

3.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

1.4%
3.3%

Industrials

PTMC
23.6%
VXF
19.3%

Technology

PTMC
16.4%
VXF
19.8%

Financial Services

PTMC
15.1%
VXF
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PTMC
10.8%
VXF
9.7%

Healthcare

PTMC
8.8%
VXF
13.3%

Real Estate

PTMC
7.0%
VXF
6.0%

Basic Materials

PTMC
4.9%
VXF
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

PTMC
4.8%
VXF
2.7%

Energy

PTMC
4.2%
VXF
5.1%

Utilities

PTMC
3.0%
VXF
2.0%

Communication Services

PTMC
1.4%
VXF
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMCVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.55

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

9.00

-1.88

PTMC vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMCVXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.48

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.27

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-58.03%

+37.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-10.21%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-26.92%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-36.39%

+19.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

-41.72%

+21.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-3.32%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-9.55%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.88%

-0.46%

Volatility

PTMC vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is 4.36%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that PTMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

5.88%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

12.90%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

17.54%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

22.37%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

22.31%

-9.32%

PTMC vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTMC vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VXF's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.64%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.04%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMC and VXF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to PTMC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 11.69% vs 5.91% for PTMC. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.04% for VXF.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.05% for VXF.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer