PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed PWC with an annualized return of 5.91%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


PTMC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
12.33%
6M
11.93%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.91%

PWC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.10%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.17%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
12.33%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
6.50%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and PWC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.65

The correlation between PTMC and PWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTMC vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTMC
PWC

Industrials

23.6%
10.3%

Technology

16.4%
26.1%

Financial Services

15.1%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.7%

Real Estate

7.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.8%

Energy

4.2%
5.5%

Utilities

3.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.4%
7.0%

Industrials

PTMC
23.6%
PWC
10.3%

Technology

PTMC
16.4%
PWC
26.1%

Financial Services

PTMC
15.1%
PWC
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PTMC
10.8%
PWC
11.5%

Healthcare

PTMC
8.8%
PWC
12.7%

Real Estate

PTMC
7.0%
PWC
5.6%

Basic Materials

PTMC
4.9%
PWC
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

PTMC
4.8%
PWC
6.8%

Energy

PTMC
4.2%
PWC
5.5%

Utilities

PTMC
3.0%
PWC
2.7%

Communication Services

PTMC
1.4%
PWC
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMCPWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.58

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

4.85

+2.27

PTMC vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMCPWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.39

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.50

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.11

+0.39

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-78.13%

+57.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.45%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-15.12%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-26.58%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

-39.45%

+18.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.77%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-36.20%

+29.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.10%

+0.32%

Volatility

PTMC vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.23%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

2.23%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

7.22%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

9.74%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

16.06%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

18.80%

-5.81%

PTMC vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTMC and PWC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PTMC vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than PWC's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.64%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.67%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMC and PWC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTMC has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to PWC (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 10-year performance, PWC leads with 9.36% vs 5.91% for PTMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWC has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTMC and PWC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.64% for PTMC.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco.

PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer