PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.


PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%

ICOW

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.06%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%17.58%1.49%10.21%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and ICOW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.54

The correlation between PTLC and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTLC vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTLC
ICOW

Technology

35.6%
6.2%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.1%

Industrials

8.3%
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.5%

Energy

3.5%
23.7%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.4%

Technology

PTLC
35.6%
ICOW
6.2%

Financial Services

PTLC
11.8%
ICOW

-

Communication Services

PTLC
11.2%
ICOW
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PTLC
10.1%
ICOW
11.6%

Healthcare

PTLC
8.5%
ICOW
7.1%

Industrials

PTLC
8.3%
ICOW
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

PTLC
4.9%
ICOW
8.5%

Energy

PTLC
3.5%
ICOW
23.7%

Utilities

PTLC
2.3%
ICOW

-

Real Estate

PTLC
1.9%
ICOW

-

Basic Materials

PTLC
1.8%
ICOW
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLCICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

4.91

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

17.54

-7.83

PTLC vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLCICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.87

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.61

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.55

+0.15

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-43.49%

+16.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-8.02%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-14.81%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

-28.48%

+13.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.64%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-7.59%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.24%

-0.03%

Volatility

PTLC vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) is 2.88%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that PTLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.41%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.59%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

13.73%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

16.64%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.47%

-5.30%

PTLC vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLC vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ICOW's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.12%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTLC and ICOW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 10.06% for ICOW. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.

PTLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer