PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLAX vs. TNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLAX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than TNSHX's 0.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PTLAX having a 1.72% annualized return and TNSHX not far ahead at 1.80%.


PTLAX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.50%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
1.72%

TNSHX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.12%
6M
0.73%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTLAX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A
0.50%5.27%4.53%4.72%-5.87%-0.96%3.11%4.19%0.21%1.50%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.73%5.31%4.03%4.05%-3.96%-0.57%3.26%4.05%1.31%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLAX and TNSHX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.72

The correlation between PTLAX and TNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLAX vs. TNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLAX
PTLAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PTLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TNSHX
TNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTLAXTNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.72

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

10.14

-3.39

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the TNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLAX and TNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLAX drawdown since its inception was -8.48%, which is greater than TNSHX's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLAX and TNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLAXTNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-5.99%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-1.13%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.60%

-1.13%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.35%

-5.99%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.48%

-5.99%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.03%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.89%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.31%

+0.12%

Volatility

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) at 0.59%. This indicates that PTLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLAXTNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.59%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

1.43%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

1.91%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.46%

2.26%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

1.82%

+0.25%

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TNSHX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLAX vs. TNSHX - Dividend Comparison

PTLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than TNSHX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLAX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A
3.94%3.93%3.86%3.48%1.37%0.56%1.53%3.07%1.86%1.39%1.66%2.16%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
4.08%4.22%3.94%2.68%1.00%1.03%1.81%2.45%1.80%1.31%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTLAX and TNSHX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTLAX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to TNSHX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLAX dropped -8.48% vs TNSHX's -5.99%.

TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLAX and TNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer