PTLAX vs. GPICX
PTLAX (PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A) and GPICX (GuidepathConservative Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PTLAX returned 1.49%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for GPICX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTLAX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 0.99% return.
PTLAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
GPICX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLAX PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A | 0.28% | 5.27% | 4.53% | 4.72% | -5.87% | -0.96% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 1.06% |
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 0.99% | 3.49% | 4.73% | 4.87% | -1.67% | 0.08% | -0.23% | 2.30% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTLAX and GPICX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTLAX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank
PTLAX
GPICX
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTLAX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 4.17 | -2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 7.91 | -4.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 2.84 | -1.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 13.88 | -11.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 69.49 | -60.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTLAX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 4.17 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 2.21 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 1.80 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTLAX drawdown since its inception was -8.48%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLAX and GPICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTLAX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -3.10% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -0.25% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.60% | -0.52% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.46% | -2.79% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | 0.00% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -0.56% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.05% | +0.36% |
Volatility
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.27%. This indicates that PTLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTLAX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.27% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 0.62% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10% | 0.83% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 1.10% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 1.06% | +1.01% |
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PTLAX and GPICX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
PTLAX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison
PTLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than GPICX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 3.80% | 3.86% | 4.53% | 4.23% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLAX PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.48% | 1.37% | 0.56% | 1.53% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTLAX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTLAX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to GPICX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLAX dropped -8.48% vs GPICX's -3.10%.
GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTLAX and GPICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer