PTLAX vs. GPARX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTLAX (PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A) and GPARX (GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PTLAX returned 1.73%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for GPARX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTLAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GPARX.

Performance

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLAX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLAX has underperformed GPARX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while GPARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.54% annualized return.

PTLAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: 1.49%
• 10Y*: 1.73%

GPARX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 16.08%
• 3Y*: 8.81%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTLAX PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A	0.28%	5.27%	4.53%	4.72%	-5.87%	-0.96%	3.11%	4.19%	0.21%	1.50%
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund	10.27%	7.42%	4.20%	6.87%	-10.82%	0.75%	3.92%	7.47%	-1.64%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLAX and GPARX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between PTLAX and GPARX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PTLAX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLAX

PTLAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
PTLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PTLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PTLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PTLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PTLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GPARX

GPARX Risk / Return Rank: 74
GPARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GPARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GPARX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GPARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GPARX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTLAX	GPARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.43	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.22	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.55	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	3.45	-1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	16.10	-7.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the GPARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLAX and GPARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTLAX	GPARX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	2.43	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.68	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.83	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	0.83	+0.54

Drawdowns

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLAX drawdown since its inception was -8.48%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLAX and GPARX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTLAX	GPARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-15.56%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.60%	-4.68%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.60%	-4.68%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.46%	-15.56%	+7.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.48%	-15.56%	+7.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.37%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-2.38%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	1.00%	-0.59%

Volatility

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) is 0.62%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that PTLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTLAX	GPARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	1.64%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.53%	6.00%	-4.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10%	6.63%	-4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.45%	5.02%	-2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.07%	4.26%	-2.19%

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTLAX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison

PTLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than GPARX's 3.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund	3.00%	3.31%	4.99%	4.81%	2.42%	1.99%	2.45%	2.76%	2.27%	1.60%	3.17%	2.15%
PTLAX PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A	3.92%	3.93%	3.86%	3.48%	1.37%	0.56%	1.53%	3.07%	1.86%	1.39%	1.66%	2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTLAX and GPARX in my portfolio?

PTLAX and GPARX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTLAX or GPARX?

GPARX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to PTLAX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLAX dropped -8.48% vs GPARX's -15.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.