TNSHX vs. GPICX
TNSHX (TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund) and GPICX (GuidepathConservative Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TNSHX returned 1.81%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for GPICX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNSHX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GPICX.
Performance
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNSHX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 0.99% return.
TNSHX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
GPICX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.61% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.50% |
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 0.99% | 3.49% | 4.73% | 4.87% | -1.67% | 0.08% | -0.23% | 2.30% | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNSHX and GPICX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018 | 0.35 |
The correlation between TNSHX and GPICX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNSHX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank
TNSHX
GPICX
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNSHX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 4.17 | -2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | 7.91 | -4.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.84 | -1.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 13.82 | -10.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 69.35 | -55.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNSHX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 4.17 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 2.19 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 1.80 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNSHX and GPICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNSHX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -3.10% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -0.25% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.13% | -0.52% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.99% | -2.79% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -0.56% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.05% | +0.25% |
Volatility
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.27%. This indicates that TNSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNSHX | GPICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 0.27% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.38% | 0.62% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 0.83% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.25% | 1.10% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 1.06% | +0.76% |
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNSHX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNSHX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison
TNSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than GPICX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 3.80% | 3.86% | 4.53% | 4.23% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 4.10% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNSHX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNSHX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to GPICX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNSHX dropped -5.99% vs GPICX's -3.10%.
GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNSHX and GPICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer