PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLAX vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLAX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLAX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.


PTLAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
1.73%

PFORX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.26%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTLAX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A
0.28%5.27%4.53%4.72%-5.87%-0.96%3.11%4.19%0.21%1.50%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.12%4.33%5.70%9.52%-10.33%-1.67%6.17%7.64%2.64%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLAX and PFORX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1996

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLAX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLAX
PTLAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PTLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLAXPFORXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

0.80

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

1.20

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.16

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.76

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.59

2.32

+6.28

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLAX and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLAXPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

0.80

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.44

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.92

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Drawdowns

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLAX drawdown since its inception was -8.48%, smaller than the maximum PFORX drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLAX and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLAXPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-13.87%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-3.99%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.60%

-3.99%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.46%

-13.71%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.48%

-13.87%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.37%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.95%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.30%

-0.89%

Volatility

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A (PTLAX) is 0.62%, while PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that PTLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLAXPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.47%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

3.38%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

3.78%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

3.61%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

3.16%

-1.09%

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLAX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

PTLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than PFORX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%
PTLAX
PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A
3.92%3.93%3.86%3.48%1.37%0.56%1.53%3.07%1.86%1.39%1.66%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTLAX and PFORX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFORX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to PTLAX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLAX dropped -8.48% vs PFORX's -13.87%.

PTLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLAX and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer