GPARX vs. RSDIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GPARX (GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund) and RSDIX (RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GPARX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RSDIX.

Performance

GPARX vs. RSDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) and RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund (RSDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GPARX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 4.62%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 1Y: 11.66%
• 3Y*: 7.82%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: 3.19%
• ALL TIME*: 2.96%

RSDIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GPARX vs. RSDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund	8.09%	7.42%	4.20%	6.87%	-10.82%	0.75%	3.92%	7.47%	-1.64%	4.50%
RSDIX RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund	-2.16%	4.86%	5.13%	5.52%	-4.00%	-0.06%	3.58%	5.47%	1.02%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GPARX and RSDIX is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between GPARX and RSDIX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GPARX vs. RSDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPARX

GPARX Risk / Return Rank: 69
GPARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GPARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GPARX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GPARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GPARX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

RSDIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPARX vs. RSDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) and RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund (RSDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPARX	RSDIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GPARX	RSDIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GPARX	RSDIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.48%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.27%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.36%	—	—

GPARX vs. RSDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPARX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RSDIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPARX vs. RSDIX - Dividend Comparison

GPARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than RSDIX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund	3.06%	3.31%	4.99%	4.81%	2.42%	1.99%	2.45%	2.76%	2.27%	1.60%	3.17%	2.15%
RSDIX RBC Short Duration Fixed Income Fund	3.65%	4.75%	4.16%	2.71%	1.92%	2.24%	2.01%	2.68%	2.44%	2.01%	1.80%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPARX and RSDIX in my portfolio?

GPARX and RSDIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.