PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPARX vs. STBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPARX vs. STBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) and Invesco Short Term Bond Fund (STBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPARX achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than STBCX's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GPARX has outperformed STBCX with an annualized return of 3.35%, while STBCX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.86% annualized return.


GPARX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.96%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
3.35%

STBCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPARX vs. STBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
8.20%7.42%4.20%6.87%-10.82%0.75%3.92%7.47%-1.64%4.50%
STBCX
Invesco Short Term Bond Fund
0.40%5.23%4.55%4.61%-5.01%-0.49%2.93%4.57%0.37%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GPARX and STBCX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between GPARX and STBCX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPARX vs. STBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPARX
GPARX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GPARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GPARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPARX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

STBCX
STBCX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
STBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
STBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
STBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPARX vs. STBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) and Invesco Short Term Bond Fund (STBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPARXSTBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.66

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

10.04

+1.88

GPARX vs. STBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the STBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPARX and STBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPARX vs. STBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPARX drawdown since its inception was -15.56%, which is greater than STBCX's maximum drawdown of -9.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPARX and STBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPARXSTBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.56%

-9.27%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.68%

-1.35%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-1.35%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-8.05%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.56%

-8.08%

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-0.36%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.01%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.36%

+0.76%

Volatility

GPARX vs. STBCX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to Invesco Short Term Bond Fund (STBCX) at 0.56%. This indicates that GPARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPARXSTBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

0.56%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.40%

1.40%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.98%

1.89%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

2.28%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.32%

2.04%

+2.28%

GPARX vs. STBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPARX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than STBCX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPARX vs. STBCX - Dividend Comparison

GPARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than STBCX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
3.06%3.31%4.99%4.81%2.42%1.99%2.45%2.76%2.27%1.60%3.17%2.15%
STBCX
Invesco Short Term Bond Fund
3.89%4.09%4.31%3.21%1.91%1.14%1.82%2.46%2.15%1.51%1.29%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPARX and STBCX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPARX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to STBCX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPARX dropped -15.56% vs STBCX's -9.27%.

GPARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPARX and STBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer