PTL vs. SPTM
PTL (Inspire 500 ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PTL tracks the Inspire 500 Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTL returned 31.98% vs 27.84% for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTL charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
PTL vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 11.10% return.
PTL
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
PTL vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 17.90% | 17.92% | 7.90% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTL and SPTM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PTL and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTL vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTL
SPTM
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
PTL
SPTM
Industrials
PTL
SPTM
Energy
PTL
SPTM
Financial Services
PTL
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
PTL
SPTM
Basic Materials
PTL
SPTM
Real Estate
PTL
SPTM
Healthcare
PTL
SPTM
Utilities
PTL
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
PTL
SPTM
Communication Services
PTL
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTL vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
PTL
SPTM
PTL vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.22 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 15.01 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.36 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.46 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
PTL vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -54.80% | +35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -8.68% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.67% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -9.05% | +6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.86% | +0.17% |
Volatility
PTL vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that PTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTL | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.88% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 8.92% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 11.88% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.87% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 18.03% | -0.35% |
PTL vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PTL vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.24% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTL and SPTM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTL dropped -19.72% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 1-year performance, PTL leads with 31.98% vs 27.84% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTL has performed better with a 31.98% return vs 27.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for PTL.
PTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.
PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTL and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer