PTIR vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. PTIR is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -42.21% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -56.90% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 5.11%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: -57.27%
• YTD: -56.90%
• 1Y: -42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-56.90%	221.36%	276.41%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and MSTZ is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 6
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	1.92	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	2.45	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.32	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	3.35	-3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	6.53	-7.46

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-99.38%	+19.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-84.89%	+5.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.30%	-97.39%	+27.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.84%	-94.53%	+64.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.56%	43.51%	+2.05%

Volatility

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) is 32.96%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that PTIR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.96%	56.56%	-23.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.46%	135.11%	-55.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.06%	148.53%	-45.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.33%	171.02%	-42.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.33%	171.02%	-42.69%

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	13.48%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and MSTZ in my portfolio?

PTIR and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to PTIR (32.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs -42.21% for PTIR. On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, PTIR has been the lower-risk option at 32.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or MSTZ?

PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or MSTZ?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 13.48%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between PTIR and MSTZ?

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.