PTIR vs. GSIB

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. PTIR is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -58.75% vs 46.76% for GSIB. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

PTIR vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 22.66% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -6.82%
• 6M: -43.20%
• YTD: -62.18%
• 1Y: -58.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 164.95%

GSIB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 7.17%
• 6M: 18.14%
• YTD: 22.66%
• 1Y: 46.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	$2.37M	$1.31M	$753.15K
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$34.43M	$50.90M	$65.92M

PTIR vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-62.18%	221.36%	425.36%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	22.66%	61.67%	11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and GSIB is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.31

PTIR vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	GSIB
Technology	100.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	99.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 90
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTIR vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	2.63	-3.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	3.65	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.43	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	3.38	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	11.87	-13.08

PTIR vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-17.71%	-61.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-13.90%	-65.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.93%	-0.11%	-73.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-1.99%	-29.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.56%	3.95%	+44.61%

Volatility

PTIR vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 27.36% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.74%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.36%	5.74%	+21.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	81.50%	14.93%	+66.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.45%	17.90%	+86.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.66%	18.46%	+109.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.66%	18.46%	+109.20%

PTIR vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, more than GSIB's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.55%	1.91%	1.67%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	15.36%	5.81%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and GSIB in my portfolio?

PTIR and GSIB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or GSIB?

PTIR has higher volatility (27.36%) compared to GSIB (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 46.76% vs -58.75% for PTIR. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 46.76% return vs -58.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or GSIB?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 1.55% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between PTIR and GSIB?

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.