PTIR vs. FNGO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO).

PTIR and FNGO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PTIR is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Sep 3, 2024. FNGO is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). It was launched on Aug 1, 2018.

Performance

PTIR vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PTIR vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-38.57%	221.36%	425.36%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	-22.92%	25.49%	45.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -38.57% return, which is significantly lower than FNGO's -22.92% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: -38.57%
• 6M: -48.17%
• 1Y: 93.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGO

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: -22.92%
• 6M: -28.65%
• 1Y: 28.52%
• 3Y*: 52.54%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.

PTIR

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF

FNGO

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 51
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 31
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTIR	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.53	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.16	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.15	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	0.74	+0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	2.08	+1.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTIR vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and FNGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTIR	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	0.53	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.65	0.53	+2.12

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and FNGO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PTIR vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	9.46%	5.81%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -69.10%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and FNGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	FNGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.10%	-78.39%	+9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.10%	-42.73%	-23.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-78.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.67%	-35.78%	-21.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.67%	-24.17%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.36%	15.17%	+15.19%

Volatility

PTIR vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 29.08% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) at 16.20%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	FNGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.08%	16.20%	+12.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.07%	30.54%	+45.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.08%	54.60%	+60.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.96%	60.29%	+70.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.96%	61.90%	+69.06%