PTIN vs. AOR
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - PTIN tracks the Pacer Trendpilot International Index while AOR tracks the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTIN returned 6.92%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for AOR. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
PTIN vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 18.60% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 8.81% return.
PTIN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
AOR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.15M | $20.19M | $21.46M | |
| $434.65K | $363.43K | $473.04K |
PTIN vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 18.60% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.75% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 8.81% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and AOR is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PTIN and AOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
AOR
PTIN vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIN | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.48 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 10.36 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -24.44% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -6.64% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -9.77% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -21.72% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.03% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -3.45% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.59% | +1.54% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.84%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 2.84% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.78% | 7.82% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 9.21% | +8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 10.68% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 10.67% | +3.45% |
PTIN vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than AOR's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.53% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PTIN and AOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTIN has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to AOR (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 5-year performance, AOR leads with 6.94% vs 6.92% for PTIN. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOR has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.14% for PTIN.
PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.15% for AOR.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer